Perfect Reign wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 00:31:15 -0700, someone posing as Kevin Nathan
> pretended that someone gave a rat's ass and spewed out:
>> On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 07:28:50 +0100
>> Roy Schestowitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> Speaking of phpBB2 (*cough* security holes *cough*) as a general CMS,
>>> I think it is a terrible idea, much like manageing a site solely on
>>> Gallery (version 2 coming out soon).
>> Yeah, I didn't mean to imply it's a CMS -- just that I'm attempting to
>> learn both at the same time . . . not an easy task! :-) The phpBB2 was
>> used for a forum for SWMBO and some of her soap-making friends, but to
>> add mods to it was a real PITA. 'Simple Machines Forum', OTOH, is
>> looking real good . . .
> I've pretty much given up on PHPbb as anything but a forum. I'm suprised
> to hear anyone speak highly of *nuke, as all I've heard is that it is a
> POS. (That's just hearsay.)
It is a resource hog, a very bloated package which is not too easy to use,
but it delivers beautiful and rich Web sites that are easy to extend (in
terms of features, not content). Fluency with XHTML/HTML is needed though,
so it is not a CMS of this generation; maybe a previous generation.
> I'm going to learn a bit more about this mambo thing. I've got it loaded
> on the laptop right now and am messing with it. I'll see when I get a site
> put out there. I think I like it even better than Xoops, which has been
> my current favorite for a while.
I did hear good things about Mambo. It appears the way to go alongside
Drupal which is also worth looking into. Expect WordPress to become a
dominant CMS player too.
Roy S. Schestowitz