Roy Schestowitz wrote:
User >> Wikipedia > Google > User
Where > denotes output and >> is append.
Google outputs users? ugh!
No user, no Wikipedia; No Wikipedia, useless spam in Google so user suffers.
and suffering leads to hate, and hate leads to...
Personally I've no problem with people putting sites in wikipedia
to get IBLs or exposure as long as it's relevant to the subject.
Relevancy is subjective, that's where the problem lies.
Subjectivity is only a problem if you think everyone should think the
same way you do, or that there is some external 'truth' which all
thought should adhere to. Either way, if it's deemed irrelevant by
someone, it'll get removed!
--
Davémon
http://www.nightsoil.co.uk
|
|
