Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer wrote:
> "Roy Schestowitz" <email@example.com> skrev i en meddelelse
>> www.1-script.com wrote:
>>> What is *right* though? Use the typos in the text and then add a small
>>> print in the footer that says "this is for you guys who cannot spell
>>> right"? ;-)
>> That's an interesting idea. It might work until search engines get mad
>> one day and decide to annul this word spamming technique. This is just
>> about as
>> bad as hidden text, is it not? When somebody contacts you about abuse,
>> you will answer "me?! English? No."
> I cannot follow you at all. Nothing to do with word spamming - it is just
> helping people who cannot spell to find a relevant page.
What Dmitri jokingly suggested was a large bunch of pages like:
Google have just introduced...
...more text here...
For those who cannot spell: mun, moun, mune, oogle, moogle, shmoogle
I don't think crawlers will perceive this with a good eye. Keywords,
however, would be a cleaner SEO technique.