Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Referrer Spam

  • Subject: Re: Referrer Spam
  • From: Ken <ng3122@ke9nr.#nospam#.net.invalid>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:27:37 -0800
  • Newsgroups: alt.html
  • Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
  • References: <d1gcj6$1hkd$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk>
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk alt.html:283507
Hi Roy -

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 05:16:35 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:

>Judging by the statistics of 3 domains, it seems like in the past month or
>two spammers found a new method of aggravating society. It becomes hard to
>analyse Web log because every second predominant entry is a link trying to
>sell you cigarettes, Viagra and pr0n.
>
>Is it just me, or do others experience the same problem? I am talking about
>a real surge here and not a moderate rise. I can no longer see my referrers
>because it's hard to distinguish spam and real citations. Is there a way to
>prevent this? (I doubt it)

I'm seeing the same thing in my logs.  I don't know what the sites are
selling because I refuse to visit such sites.  (I know by the
documents being requested and the number of entries all right together
from widely scattered IP addresses that it isn't legitimate referrer
information.)

When I get a round tuit, I'm going to update my httpd.conf file to
watch for those referrers and do something other than returning the
requested documents.  The documents are fairly large.  Whatever I do
will be much smaller and will return a code other than 200.

-- 
Ken
http://www.ke9nr.net/

  • References:
    • Referrer Spam
      • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com>
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index