__/ [Big Bill] on Sunday 20 November 2005 15:10 \__
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:42:54 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [Borek] on Sunday 20 November 2005 10:28 \__
>>
>>> On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:09:35 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am not too sure. In fact, I wonder if it will ever drop pages from its
>>>> index as a result of /modified/ robots.txt. I really hope so because it
>>>> indexed many pages I did not intend for it to ever have access to.
>>>
>>> http://services.google.com:8882/urlconsole/controller
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Borek
>>
>>Interesting! Thanks for that.
>>
>>Just in case this entailed a penalty, I have also submitted a reinclusion
>>request this morning:
>>
>>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/
>>
>><quote>
>>
>>As part of my collaboratory research, I share output of my experiments
>>among my colleagues. I put these under my domain. Only recently it
>>slipped my mind that crawlers might reach it sooner or late because
>>there was a link (it took about 10 months to reach the experiments). As
>>a result, tens of thousands of pages which contain numerical results got
>>indexed. As soon as I noticed the jump from ~25k to ~80k pages in the
>>datacentres (over the period of just days or weeks), I was shocked and
>>immediately added the following to my robots.txt.
>>
>>Disallow: /Research/Resources/Experiments/
>>
>>That is where all of these newly-added pages lie. I hope you can remove
>>the penalty (Google referral dropped by over 80%).
>>
>>Many thanks in advance,
>>
>>Roy
>>
>></quote>
>>
>>Ouch...
>>
>>Roy
>
> Hmmmm...and who do we know that you conspicuously link to?
>
> BB
It's no penalty, but I wanted them to remove these pages either way. This
was a contact opportunity where I have nothing to lose. Google Search
still refer around 100 people to my site every day. Google images refer
around 300 per day. As I said, there should be no penalty, but I wanted
them to take an overview and tweak if/as required.
I used to have better placements. If rank is an inverse function of number
of pages in a domain, this needs to be corrected. These machine vision ex-
periments got indexed without my awareness. As these are just heaps of
numbers, they will not add noise to the results, trust me.
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | Have you hugged your penguin today?
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
4:00pm up 17 days 11:54, 4 users, load average: 1.57, 1.41, 0.87
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
