Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Alexa (Moving to Live.com?)

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:58:17 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>__/ [ DJ ] on Saturday 29 April 2006 18:46 \__
>
>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:6459058.iugK3BSlLl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> __/ [ DJ ] on Saturday 29 April 2006 08:25 \__
>>>
>>>> Not really a big issue but Alexa / A9 doesn't seem to use google anymore?
>>>
>>> Blimey! You're quite right. I can see the gross degradation in terms of
>>> the
>>> relevance of results, having used A9 several times in the page. Why would
>>> they give up Google? Either Google have something against them (the image
>>> search component suggests otherwise) or somebody paid a decent sum of
>>> money
>>> to have things changed.
>>>
>>> I suspect the latter is true:
>>>
>>>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/28/technology/28soft.html&OQ=_rQ3D1&OP=7574baa1Q2F6tJr6R-Q7Clm--uv6vFFn6FQ3E6vE6uJQ7Cxi-q-Q24Q606vEl-Q5DuBxuQ22q
>>>
>>>        Is Microsoft Preparing a Big Attack?
>>>
>>> The context for this article: taking aim at Google. They invest a billion
>>> or
>>> two in this, I suspect.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Roy
>>>
>> Looks like it taking msn results - a big step backwards for Alexa - msn
>> results in my opinion are pretty poor compared with google.
>
>You encouraged me to write about it, eventually <
>http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/04/29/a9-alexa-microsoft-live/
>>. Thanks for the heads-up.
>
>I used to recommend A9 for those with high-speed connections I quite liked
>the image view (reminds me of < http://bettersearch.g-blog.net/ >), which
>complemented the SERP that was a Google twin with extra widgets (site info,
>related sites, traffic ranks, etc.). Without quality results (deep,
>inquisitive, as oppose to shallow), I might as well just stick with
>Wikipedia/Google/Scroogle. Wait until deploration among A9 loyals begins.
>
>I happened to notice that A9 are finally doing some Wikipedia harvesting as
>well (albeit it's optional).

What's the way that Amazon determine the "like that" choices, you
know, people who bought that book also bought, etc? What's the proper
name for it?

BB
-- 

http://www.kruse.co.uk/sandbox.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/willow-tree/index.html
  

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index