__/ [ spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ] on Sunday 20 August 2006 12:47 \__
> Aquila Deus <aquila.deus@xxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
>> Plato wrote:
>>> Aquila Deus wrote:
>>> >
>>> > http://static.flickr.com/88/219585590_3a92abd9b1_o.png
>>>
>>> MS Vista is NOT yet avaiable for purchase.
>
>> Then why it released a beta which can't even install?
>
>> It's BETA not ALPHA, which means it should be 90% complete and suitable
>> for testing.
>
>> ALPHA - working in progress
>> BETA - minor features and fixes (SETUP IS NOT A MINOR PART!)
>> RC - small fixes
>
> I thought everyone knew microsoft had redefined their terms...
> Service pack 1 - Whateveryone else calls RC1
> Final release - Beta
> RC - What's an RC?
> Beta - Alpha
> God knows what their alpha releases look like.
http://www.microbizz.nl/buglist.htm
|
|