Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: First Day with Vista!!

  • Subject: Re: First Day with Vista!!
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:44:25 +0100
  • Followup-to: alt.os.windows-xp
  • Newsgroups: alt.os.windows-xp, comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / ISBE, Manchester University / ITS
  • References: <1156039762.502021.135620@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <44e7ecf9$1$4821$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com> <1156050662.833374.134230@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <kiulr3-e5a.ln1@ridcully.ntlworld.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ] on Sunday 20 August 2006 12:47 \__

> Aquila Deus <aquila.deus@xxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
>> Plato wrote:
>>> Aquila Deus wrote:
>>> >
>>> > http://static.flickr.com/88/219585590_3a92abd9b1_o.png
>>>
>>> MS Vista is NOT yet avaiable for purchase.
> 
>> Then why it released a beta which can't even install?
> 
>> It's BETA not ALPHA, which means it should be 90% complete and suitable
>> for testing.
> 
>> ALPHA - working in progress
>> BETA - minor features and fixes (SETUP IS NOT A MINOR PART!)
>> RC - small fixes
> 
> I thought everyone knew microsoft had redefined their terms...
> Service pack 1 - Whateveryone else calls RC1
> Final release - Beta
> RC - What's an RC?
> Beta - Alpha
> God knows what their alpha releases look like.

http://www.microbizz.nl/buglist.htm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index