__/ [ Kelsey Bjarnason ] on Sunday 13 August 2006 11:48 \__
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:51:10 -0400, news.cogeco.ca wrote:
>
>>
>> "Stuart Krivis" <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> It's better than emacs. :-) It seems that you need 12 or 13 fingers to
>>> be able to use emacs properly.
>>
>> Translation - Emacs is user hostile.
>>
>> Yes it is. Very much so.
>>
>> As is virtually everything that comes from the minds of Bonehead
>> Unix/Linux/C/C++ morons.
>
> You mean like OpenOffice, which works just fine for all my needs?
>
> How about kmail, which does everything I need a mail client to do?
>
> Or bash, which makes the Windows command line look retarded?
>
> kopete, which, unlike the usual suspects, actually comprehends that
> there's more than one IM service out there?
>
> kate, which makes the editors bundled with Windows look crippled?
>
> konq, which can do everything from managing remote files over a secure
> shell connection, to ripping CDs to a variety of formats?
>
> Yes, yes, all very user hostile, all very difficult, all very
> feature-limited.
>
> Next.
I'll go next.
KPager, which enables you to see all your virtual desktops (Windows users
rarely know what this means) and even drag and drop applications, depicted
as rich XPM's, from one desktop to another?
KNode, which unlike another so-called mail/news reader, actually puts the
cursor at the bottom when replying? And incorporates all the feature one
might need? Again, most Windows users will never realise what they miss
until/unless they were given all these features and then had them taken
away, overnight.
AmaroK anyone?
There are so many more, but why feed the new troll? A small taste of
inferiority should be enough.
|
|
