__/ [ Big Bill ] on Monday 28 August 2006 15:54 \__
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:04:26 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [ AllenHarkleroad ] on Monday 28 August 2006 13:41 \__
>>
>>> <Snip />
>>
>>It is possible that Google picks up portions of the page, but how would it
>>be able to determine which one/s? And since when has it been doing this?
>>Anchor text is fairly arbitrary (although I rank well for "roy" somehow),
>>so I began wondering if Google is beginning to /learn/ from content, much
>>in the same way that Googlism was intended to speculate based on Google
>>Search (back in 2003 when I last checked it). I am aware that Google has
>>plans of using richer information in one form or another, so could this be
>>the start of a change wherein your SERP's are determined by semantics,
>>rather than what the author embeds in the page? This could combat deceitful
>>content and SPAM. I am trying to find other examples of this...
>
> If this was an experiment, wouldn't they only be using it in one small
> subset of serps? Have you tried other Googles?
Yes, I have tried a few more. Particularly, I concentrated on personal Web
sites that I regularly visit, but <title> contents were obeyed and displayed
unchanged.
|
|
