__/ [ John Bailo ] on Monday 21 August 2006 16:35 \__
> Doug Mentohl wrote:
>> Pamela Jones, Network World (US online)
>> Aug 15 2006 07:57:12
>>
>> So, just where do things stand legally in the Linux world, post-SCO?
>> What has changed as a result of the SCO saga? If a Son of SCO shows up
>> in the future, is the community prepared? What is now in place that
>> wasn't there when SCO first showed up in 2003? Here is a brief summary
>> to bring you up to date.
>
> Is it really over?
>
> The claims were reduced...but isn't there still litigation?
IBM hasn't challenged the remainder, or there wasn't sufficient proof to have
them backed or annihilated. Ask Rex about it. He knows much better...
> And of course, the bad blood of the whole thing.
>
>
>> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;724544089;pp;2;fp;16;fpid;0
>> http://www.groklaw.net/
|
|
