__/ [ Who Turned Off The Lights? ] on Wednesday 22 February 2006 16:14 \__
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:55:16 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> __/ [ hug ] on Wednesday 22 February 2006 12:48 \__
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>If it weren't a standardised location
>>>>such as ~/favicon.ico , then you could substitude the location, pointing
>>>>your visitors at the right place while serving Yahoo with indecent icons.
>>>>With many furious Yahoo customers, they would have immediately gotten the
>>> While I kind of like the idea of creating irate customers this way,
>>> there is a certain risk that the indecent icons will be even more
>>> popular than the original one. <g>
>> Well, not necessarily. Back in 2004, a Croatian forum administrator was
>> HotLinking an image of mine and using it as his avatar. This was a rather
>> high-traffic forum, so it was difficult to ignore the effect on bandwidth.
>> After 2 weeks without reply from any the clown, I decided to replace his
>> avatar with a photo of a small and ugly penis. It didn't take long before
>> HotLinking reached its end and the humiliated guy apologised to me.
> Although I like that idea......Errr, to put a tiny peepee or any other
> indecent item into a Favicon would be pretty, ummmmm, tiny? 'think
> anybody'd really notice it?
Do some nasty things to it and make the experience even /more/ insulting and
repellent. In fact, one could downsize a pr0n clip. The animation would make
it graphical enough, in Firefox at least. Other users would remain on the