Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Google Computers - Hardware Coming to Town

__/ [Big Bill] on Wednesday 04 January 2006 15:06 \__

> On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:00:01 +0100, Borek
> <m.borkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 12:33:51 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>><newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I am guessing that most of Google's boxes 00those that collect dust in
>>> large
>>> datacentre -- are built to be cheap, which in turns enables Google to buy
>>> more (thereby accumulating more storage, do more crawling, etc.). No
>>> software licences are needed either. I would not be surprised if
>>> datacentres
>>> (not only Google's) got accommodated with some otherwise 'junk yard 486'
>>> PC's. At least they serve someone.
>>> Cost-effective computing at Google pays off, albeit it serves a different
>>> purpose year. It's affordability for customers and scalability for
>>> Google.
>>If Google hardware staff is as good as their html staff - you are right.
>>But only then :)
>>You can't make cost-effective computing with old computers. 24 100MHz 486
>>eat several times more energy than 1 2.4GHz Pentium, plus you need 24 times
>>more manpower for maintaining it and 24 times rack space -- assuming they
>>do the same job, 2.4GHz is a cheaper solution.
>>To remain cost-effective their datacenters have to be rebuilt every 2-3,
>>maximum 4 years.
> I seem to recall that Google have indeed been moaning about the cost
> of energy lately. Maybe these new machines are a response to that.

Machines? I thought they used pigeons.

Google  could possibly pay customers and then borrow some resources  (net-
work bandwidth is important) from them. Ultimately, customers would report
back  to the datacentres. If they sell machines worldwide, this could help
establish  distributed, fragmented datacentres that perhaps act as proxies

Their  new machines could have these functions embedded; Linux has  excel-
lent  multi-tasking capabilities. In fact, they could afford to distribute
their  boxes  for virtually a pittance (enough to ensure people don't  buy
unneeded  boxes  for the heck of it). Microsoft are using similar  tactics
with  the  Xbox 360, which is sold at a price that does not cover for  the
manufacturing cost.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index