__/ [ The Ghost In The Machine ] on Monday 10 July 2006 18:00 \__
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote
> on Sat, 08 Jul 2006 13:02:51 +0100
> <5646789.FTiY1mYcQn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | WinFS was dropped from Vista in what company executives described at the
>> | time as a trade-off to get the operating system completed in a timely
>> | manner. The release of Vista has since been delayed again and is now
>> | scheduled for November for large customers and January 2007 for the
>> | general public, though some observers say it may be out even later.
>> `----
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>
>> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoft/2003090022_winfs28.html
>>
>> Incomplete (feature-wise), half-baked, not secure, and released beyond the
>> originally-named date. It's a recipe for a blunder.
>
> If they're not careful. Win95 was delayed, too, and was one of
> Microsoft's more notable successes.
Delays in this case are due to bugs, not a belated feature freeze. Published
today:
,----[ Quote ]
| A recent internal Microsoft e-mail debating
| the merits of a delay hinted (between the lines, we hear) that yet
| another Vista delay could be in the cards.
`----
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1986615,00.asp?kc=MWRSS02129TX1K0000535
> But we'll see. Win95, after all, was before Microsoft had serious
> competition for the x86 desktop.
Yes. Important fact. A natural transition from 3.1 (the upgrade then was more
considerable and compelling). Then there were the toys and a very immature
kernel for GNU. Yes, Sun and others were there too but not very visible to
home users...
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | McDonald's Certified Sandwich Engineer (MCSE)
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
6:00pm up 73 days 23:03, 12 users, load average: 2.30, 2.09, 1.62
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
|
|