Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Steven Vaugn-Nichols on LAMP-WAMP comparison

  • Subject: Re: Steven Vaugn-Nichols on LAMP-WAMP comparison
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:59:21 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <1152688081.703199.153470@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1152691143.432603.104080@35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ hanumizzle@xxxxxxxxx ] on Wednesday 12 July 2006 08:59 \__

> nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> "I think the tests were perfectly fair. "
>>
>> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS6492047053.html
> 
> ...where the definition of 'fair' is significantly overloaded.

Steven has been working for eWEEK for years. Would he criticise his
colleague's published work? That was my sudden instinct when I spotted that
he had commented on the benchmark, before I even read his essay.

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      |    Useless fact: Every polar bear is left-handed
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 173 total,   4 running, 151 sleeping,   0 stopped,  18 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index