yttrx wrote:
> [H]omer <spam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> yttrx wrote:
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> HOW-TO: Dreamweaver running on Ubuntu in 10 EASY Steps!
>>>>
>>>>
http://blog.publicidadpixelada.com/how-to-dreamweaver-8-in-ubuntu-in-10-easy-steps/
>>> Nice, youve posted a link to instructions on how to get windows
>>> application to run under wine. That's so helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, in the instructions it is suggested that the user pirate
>>> Dreamweaver.
>>>
>>> Yeah, youre helping.
>> And *you're* helping to reaffirm that the WinTrolls in this NG are
>> all dead from the neck up.
> Ummm...
>> Nowhere in that article does it suggest that anyone should *steal*
>> the software; the words used are "dreamweaver.exe MUST be cracked
>> or patched", that is *not* the same as using a pirate copy.
> You're a pirate apologist, and you're clearly advocating the
> pirating of windows software, I suspect, because you have no regard
> or respect for the people who write it.
I suspect that you're an idiot. Explain exactly how I am advocating
piracy by drawing a distinction between hacking and theft.
>> I remember often using "cracks" on legitimate software; e.g. to
>> enable playing games without repeatedly swapping in and out the
>> install disks (a process that has now been refined using the
>> so-called "mini-ISO" method).
> Yes, but thats not necessary with dreaweaver.
Well the author of that article seems to think otherwise.
>> Presumably Dreamweaver uses some DRM software that cannot be
>> emulated under Linux, and so running DW under Wine will fail the
>> DRM check, unless that DRM is bypassed. Bypassing some draconian
>> DRM measure is *not* the same as "piracy".
> Wrong. You can either apply a legitimate license key--or you can
> apply a cracked license key. Have you ever actually used
> dreamweaver?
Have *you* ever actually used Dreamweaver under Wine, without using
the cracked binary? I'm sure the author would welcome your /extensive/
experience.
--
K.
http://slated.org - Slated, Rated & Blogged
This message has not been photoshopped in any way.
Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5
16:19:30 up 40 days, 16:36, 3 users, load average: 0.07, 0.22, 0.32
|
|
