Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [Op/Ed] Commericial Software Dead?

  • Subject: Re: [Op/Ed] Commericial Software Dead?
  • From: Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:18:32 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <2382831.MtpGFVPcrc@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1114728
begin  oe_protect.scr 
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> SOA and OSS to replace it?
> 
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| You can't toss a computer scientist without hitting someone saying
>| that software is dead. Venture capitalists think it (some are even moving
>| on to energy and elsewhere), the market thinks it (multiples are at
>| historical lows), and would-be software engineers think it (applications
>| to CompSci programs remain in the basement).
> `----
> 
> http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2006/05/30/rumors_of_softw.html
> 
> Notice the complementary comments.

It's not dead, it's just that a lock-in based business model is dead.
Software has never been more alive than it is now, but because it's
entered the commodity marketplace, where margins are wafer-thin,   the VCs
are not seeing easy money.  Support and integration skills requirements
are going to grow like nobody's business, however, since every comp-sci,
engineering, maths graduate or whoever else is going to be able to call
on top-class code to build whatever they like.  The skills are going to
be at the top-end of the stack, and in support.  

-- 
| Mark Kent   --   mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk  |
VMS, n.:
	The world's foremost multi-user adventure game.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index