Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Microsoft Manipulates Netscraft Figures

  • Subject: Re: Microsoft Manipulates Netscraft Figures
  • From: "asj" <kalim1998@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 9 Jun 2006 19:58:37 -0700
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
  • In-reply-to: <zyqfm0gbfri3.dlg@funkenbusch.com>
  • Injection-info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.250.5.36; posting-account=2SNXkgwAAABm6kAlcXuvGCvkJMcTwaRH
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <4571675.1I6Au5I4xx@schestowitz.com> <1x5i72nc6tgib.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <1149892194.420078.251170@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <zyqfm0gbfri3.dlg@funkenbusch.com>
  • User-agent: G2/0.2
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1117863
Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> Of course it accounts for it.  But the Linux users seem to want to focus
> only on the domain parking issue, and ignore the fact that IIS grew by
> about 75% outside of domain parking.

dude, you're convincing no one. given a free and non-manipulated
environment, i cannot see why apache wouldn't slowly crush windows on
web servers given that (1) the perception is that apache/linux is a
more stable, secure setup; (2) it's free.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index