On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:24:24 -0500, flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 03:00:31 +0000, Sinister Midget wrote:
>
> Yet you and your Koolaid drinking Linux nutsacks ignore the fact that Roy
> is ethically wrong.
'Koolaid drinking nutsacks'? Strange how you can't make a point without
resorting to that tired inulting crap you love to spew. How you have athe
nerve to talk about ethics, I can't magine.
>
> It goes well beyond Windows vs Linux.
>
> Like I said, the Linux community has spoken volumes about their motives
> and character, based upon this thread.
Just as you have made it so very obvious what *you* are.
> Ya'll can dance, bob and weave all you like but it all boils down to a
> very simple issue and Roy S is wrong.
>
> The rest of you just look like zealot idiots for backing him up.
> Roy S is wrong and nothing you can squawk about will change that.
Nothing you can squawk changes what you are, either, flatfish.
BTW, I never once said what Roy did was correct. Personally, I wouldn't
contacted the owner of the material, got clarification from him, and taken
down the offending image if necessary.
What I objected to is the character assassination which followed, and
which you are still a prominant part of.
You constantly whine about the so-called 'gang' defending Linux advocates.
Yet never once do you think to look at yourself. What are *you* doing that
is any different? You are just like a jackal, running in a little pack,
coming in to savage a wounded animal.
What a hypocrite you are.
--
Kier
|
|
