__/ [ George Graves ] on Friday 30 June 2006 05:49 \__
> In article <_R1pg.113$V14.77@xxxxxxxx>, Susan <no.online.email@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> John Bailo wrote:
>> > http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/74868
>>
>> "The City of Munich's LiMux project center is rejecting charges by the
>> Senate administration of Berlin that the migration to free software has
>> gotten stuck before it ever got going. As Project director Peter Hofmann
>> told heise online, "Open Source software at the workplace is a reality in
>> Munich." At the end of May, his department presented the future basis
>> client to the public at in information day. At present, the pilot phase is
>> focusing on a software suite. The approximately 100 pilot users include
>> Mayor Christian Ude and his deputy Christine Strobl. Hofmann added that
>> "most users" in the city's administration use individual Open Source
>> programs to surf the net, write e-mails, or edit graphics, for example,
>> "on the Microsoft Windows operating system, which remains dominant."
>>
>> "on the Microsoft Windows operating system, which remains dominant."
>>
>> Message-ID: Xt-cnWBUrr37d0ijXTWcqQ@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Microsoft's offer of about 27.3 million euros ($32.3 million) had been
>> almost three million euros below that of the Linux competitor, but the
>> city had still chosen Linux for strategic reasons."
>>
>> "strategic reasons"
>>
>> LMAO
>>
>> 3½ years 100 users 27.3 million Euros
>>
>> Seeing the Munich "migration" fail miserably: priceless
>>
>>
>> Now this is REAL FUNNY!!
>>
>> Funny how the Linux Nutsacks seem to be avoiding this little gem..........
>
> I hope Munich's decision doesn't fuck-up the beer!
Susan=flatfish. Set up your killfiles/filters.
[groups reduced]
|
|