Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ mark r ] on Thursday 22 June 2006 17:59 \__
>
> > Paul wrote:
> >> On 22 Jun 2006 09:18:54 -0700, "mark r" <markrush@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Paul wrote:
> >> >> On 22 Jun 2006 08:53:59 -0700, "mark r" <markrush@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Hi guys. my site www.iosilver.co.uk has dissapeared from googles
> >> >> >listings.
>
>
> Not quite. I can see it listed. It was never banned.
>
>
> >> >> Define listings.
> >> >>
> >> >> Do you mean your SERPS ?
> >> >> Or do you mean that you cannot find yourself in google ?
> >> >>
> http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2005-36,GGLD:en&q=%222005+io+Silver+Jewellery%2E+All+rights+reserved%2E+io+Silver+Jewellery+is+part+of+the+io+Jewellery+group+of+web+sites%22
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > is it because googles broken or some other reason?
> >> >>
> >> >> You know google is having problems, so why ask.
> >> >>
> >> >> Other reasons ? Depends if you have stopped black hatting ?
> >> >>
> >> >> >how do you tell?
> >> >>
> >> >> Depends on your original question. (ref : Define Listings)
> >> >>
> >> >> <snip />
>
>
> The original post was deceiving. The content should have gone along the lines
> of "I am not happy with my position in the SERP's", unless I am missing
> something. SERP's (ranks) are indeed affected by Google's 'errors' (or
> sufficiently good SPAM-handling mechanisms... lack thereof).
>
>
> >> >I still cram links - looking at my competitors, many have removed their
> >> >links pages (the pages are still there, just the links have been
> >> >removed) is there something about link exchanging i should know about?
>
>
> Cutts said that affiliated links that get crammed at the bottom will either
> get you penalised or be ignored.
>
>
> >> You mean the link to the links page has gone, or your link on their
> >> links page has gone ?
> >>
> >> Sounds like you are on about the former.
> >> I've no idea, not bothered checking IBLs for a while.
> >>
> >> >- i also noticed that here more and more people are linking to sub
> >> >pages, not the home page, again is this the new method?
> >>
> >> I have both links to internal pages and the main page. New method ?
> >> NIMO.
> >>
> > <snip />
> >
> > they still have their links pages, but theres no links on them (im not
> > listed and never was) i try to analyse why and how competitors are
> > above me bu looking for the similarities.
>
>
> Shouldn't the subject line be modified then? *polite smile*
>
> For those of us who look at the subject line for 'zeitgeist', a good title
> can help. Sorry if this sounds like policing. It's intended to be a friendly
> suggestion.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Roy
>
> --
> Roy S. Schestowitz | GPL'd 3-D Othello: http://othellomaster.com
> http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
> 12:50pm up 56 days 18:04, 12 users, load average: 0.37, 0.93, 1.22
> http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
roy: nope, my site was nowhere, its just popped back into existence,
ive not done anything that would have caused this apart from tidying
some products.
|
|