__/ [ Kier ] on Sunday 05 March 2006 16:06 \__
> On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:57:34 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> __/ [ Kier ] on Sunday 05 March 2006 15:50 \__
>>> On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 06:01:15 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> To be fair, I have come across similar setups with Windows.
>>> Not something I'm, considering doing myself, but an interesting article
>>> none the less, thanks, Roy.
>> See the follow-up to Mr. Midget. It saves very little money and offer very
>> little, based on factual figures and personal experience. To make this
>> cost-effective, you ought to be looking at large cluster and a super-high
>> spec 'Master' with a high-bandwidth connection. I saw it deployed with
>> about a dozen 'Slaves', but it assume the users' time (impatience) is
>> worthless. Hardware is not /that/ expensive nowadays.
> True. As Heinlein says, "There are better ways of skinning a cat than
> shaving him with a table knife." :-)
This reminded me of a joke:
(addendum: not _really_ pr0nographic)
Roy S. Schestowitz | What is all that lipstick in XP's close button?
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
4:15pm up 4 days 11:53, 12 users, load average: 1.00, 0.53, 0.39
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine