Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Natural Search and Branded Sites

  • Subject: Re: Natural Search and Branded Sites
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:03:44 +0000
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <1142296873.766658.57040@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <0_pRf.6811$ng.234728@news20.bellglobal.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ canadafred ] on Tuesday 14 March 2006 02:35 \__

> <evanpadgett@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1142296873.766658.57040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>> Would I be running a risk of delisting by having two different sites
>> out there that have similar content, but one is optimized for natural
>> search, and one is a flashy (literall) branded site.
>>
>> The reasoning being, is that even though they both will be information
>> rich, one of them will be interactive and utilizing a lot of flash,
>> while the other is text and information heavy to rank high in other
>> words.
>>
>> I would only be officially submitting one (the optimized one of course)
>> to google, but im worried about the other getting spidered somehow.
>> Thanks!
> 
> Sounds like a good plan to me. Both sites should appear like different
> sites to the search engine. It's like I have a site in English that is
> exactly duplicated in French. Exactly the same content just presented in
> two different ways. You have one that is text heavier and another which is
> flashier.

I agree. It should be fine. It is both ethical and practically plausible.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index