__/ [ John ] on Thursday 16 March 2006 17:34 \__
> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> __/ [ Paul B ] on Thursday 16 March 2006 01:17 \__
>>> From :
>>> http://<burp />/2006/03/15/technology/15google.html?_r=1&th=&ad...
>> Speaking about long URL's and registered users-only articles, It's funny
>> journalists are trying to 'beat' the Web and reclaim lost readership and
>> revenue streams.
>>> SAN JOSE, Calif., March 14 ? After the Justice Department drastically
>>> reduced its request for information from Google, a federal judge said
>>> on Tuesday that he intended to approve at least part of that request.
>>> The government first subpoenaed Web data from Google last August, as
>>> part of its defense of an online pornography law.
>> Whenever Google faces court, it is something to do with pr0n. *grin*
> Is this about porn in general or is it about child porn?
No. I was thinking about erotica and pr0n sites, which have been suing Google
for years, over fair use matters.
Roy S. Schestowitz | Useless fact: Sharks are immune to cancer
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
6:05pm up 8 days 10:42, 7 users, load average: 1.57, 1.05, 0.80
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project