Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Why Linux is so successful

  • Subject: Re: Why Linux is so successful
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 04:57:08 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <nda5g.2431$c%5.458@trnddc02> <pan.2006.04.30.22.37.30.292869@zianet.com> <LId5g.2468$c%5.2360@trnddc02>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Mathew P. ] on Monday 01 May 2006 02:43 \__

> On 2006-04-30, ray spake thusly:
>> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:44:51 +0000, Mathew P. wrote:
>>
>>> 
>>> Three words:
>>> 
>>> Reliability
>>> 
>>> Portability
>>> 
>>> Scalability
>>> 
>>>
>>
>> You missed one: security
> 
> Perhaps, but wouldn't that come under "reliability"

In my opinion, security should often be assumed. It's only longed for when
you realise what happens in the lack of security, i.e. prevalence of
loopoles. To elaborate, lack security is where function is given which can
be exploited by the wrong people. Even buffer overflows are a matter of
handling edge cases properly.

Just my opinion,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      |    Warning 0x12C: ispell feels tired
http://Schestowitz.com  |    SuSE Linux     ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  4:50am  up 3 days 11:47,  13 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
      http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index