Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Linux Filesystems Comparison/Benchmark

  • Subject: Re: [News] Linux Filesystems Comparison/Benchmark
  • From: rapskat <rapskat@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:31:22 -0400
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
  • References: <6000262.ap0XDyKP3v@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: Pan/ (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux))
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1109663
On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:32:35 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> Filesystems (ext3, reiser, xfs, jfs) comparison on Debian Etch
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | There are a lot of Linux filesystems comparisons available but most of them 
> | are anecdotal, based on artificial tasks or completed under older kernels. 
> | This benchmark essay is based on 11 real-world tasks appropriate for a file 
> | server with older generation hardware (Pentium II/III, EIDE hard-drive).
> `----
>                 http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388

That's pretty much the conclusion that I'd come to as well: Overall, XFS
is the best GP filesystem for storage, especially on partitions of 100GB
or more.

That's not based on any benchmark, just usage and observation.

rapskat -  11:28:09 up 4 days, 16:27,  2 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.24, 0.26
	Don't allow your kids to become desensitized to violence.
Beat them harder each day.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index