On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:11:46 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>__/ [ Borek ] on Wednesday 24 May 2006 12:02 \__
>
>> On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:46:25 +0200, Cookie <tomsamuels@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I've got a brand new web site launched in early January. It's doing
>>> well on MSN but with Google I'm appearing for a few very niche keywords
>>> but for other more popular words my site is not listed. I of course
>>> understand the sandbox situation but isn't this behaviour odd? Any
>>> thoughts?
>>
>> Standard. Wait till Autumn.
>
>Would it be safe to say that same about Google's somewhat catastrophic
>errors? On Friday, an engineer said it would take just a couple to rectidy.
>Sounds like an excuse that quiets down the mob (Webmasters)...
They'd be the ones outside the Googleplex with the pitchforks and
flaming torches...
It's like this every time Google does an update, this time it's so bad
and so many more people are on the web these days that it's getting
more attention.
BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-tips.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/salvador-dali-prints.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/boyds-bearstones/index.html
|
|
