Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Why Linux Will NEVER go Mainstream On The Desktop. (Wonder how Roy could have missed this one?)

  • Subject: Why Linux Will NEVER go Mainstream On The Desktop. (Wonder how Roy could have missed this one?)
  • From: flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:12:48 -0500
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy, microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, alt.os.windows-xp
  • Organization: mariana.trench
  • User-agent: Shysterwitch version 0.99.18.41.03.21-a
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1179823 microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:1394154 alt.os.windows-xp:454035
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=140

This reads like it came right out of COLA!!

(Note the 1 percent desktop user base figure.)

"But hardware support on Linux is good - all my stuff works!

If all your hardware works, great.  Congratulations.  But ask yourself these two questions:

    * How much extra effort did you have to go to to get it to work?
    * Did you research your purchase in advance to make sure that it would work?

If you answered "yes" to either of these questions then you are willing to
go to more effort than the average home buyer looking for a new printer,
scanner or video card.  Your average buyer isn't even willing to do enough
research to make sure that they get the lowest price (that's how stores
that charge over the odds stay in business).  Is this the kind of person
who's going to check to see if there's Linux support for what they want?"


and.........................

" Poor hardware/software/games support is not a Linux issue

True.  It's a developer issue.  But developers (and the folks who pay their wages) are following the money, and at present there's not a lot of money to be made from the Linux market.

Another reason that hardware support is patchy is that manufacturers don't
want their code secrets going open source - it's easier for a business to
deal with another business than it is to deal with the open source
community."



and.................................

" Linux is more secure than Windows

Yes, but â do you think that the average user who runs executable attachments sent to them by email or who consents to the installation of adware or spyware on their machines would really be safer on Linux? 

At present there's a bar of technical competence that users wanting to
make use of Linux have to be able to clear.  This alone makes them
unlikely to be the kind of people who do things that put their systems at
risk.  Security is not about software, it's mostly about education."



and........so much more.........

Read it and decide for yourself.

I expect total and complete denial, discrediting the author and the usual
grade school tactics used by the COLA gang to save Linux from bad press.






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index