Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Here we go again (unpatched, naturally)

  • Subject: Re: Here we go again (unpatched, naturally)
  • From: Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:50:58 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <eicnrk$42r$00$1@news.t-online.com> <1162473664.17845.0@proxy00.news.clara.net> <tq8r14-4rd.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk> <3144191.Ojb7YD8UDO@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1176901
begin  oe_protect.scr 
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:

> 
> Microsoft : Arrogance leads to Vulnerability
> 
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| Chatting with the Microsoft senior sales people, I was struck by
>| their incredible arrogance. They know the company?s products are good,
>| but they have no qualms whatsoever about charging top dollar as a
>| result.
>| 
>| It reminds us how Microsoft used to behave when it comes to their
>| products' security records. IE5 and 6 were nothing short of being
>| proper Swiss Cheese with loads of holes in them but hey, they had 95%
>| of the browser market at that time and couldn't care less.
> `----
> 
> http://securityblog.itproportal.com/?p=514
> 


That's about the full summary, isn't it?  

-- 
| Mark Kent   --   mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk  |
You can prove anything by mentioning another computer language.  :-)

             -- Larry Wall in <199706242038.NAA29853@xxxxxxxx>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index