Sandman wrote:
> In article <1250942.sS2tyqdNR3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Microsoft Zune Review
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | "It had to offer obvious and immediate benefits over Apple's system
>> | and it had to be priced lower. In other words, if Microsoft wasn't
>> | truly serious about this endeavor, the company should forget aboutf
>> | ielding its own device."
>> |
>> | [...]
>> |
>> | "The bottom line is that Microsoft should have waited until it had a
>> | more compelling product to sell. I can't imagine what they were
>> | thinking."
>> |
>> | I had the misfortune to be at BestBuy this weekend and witnessed a
>> | Zune return.
>> |
>> | "Can I just go get an iPod and not wait in that line?"
>> |
>> | "Was there something wrong with it?'
>> |
>> | "Yea, it sucks..can I just run over there and grab an iPod..."
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.winsupersite.com/reviews/zune.asp
>>
>> And Windocates blindly say that the best products come from Microsoft...
>
> ...when they in fact come from Apple? :)
>
>
Nope. The Zune may be typical MS garbage, but the iPod is overpriced.
You get better players for less money
--
If you're right 90% of the time, why quibble about the remaining 3%?
|
|
