Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Suitability of Windows for Desktop Users Put to the Test

  • Subject: Re: [News] Suitability of Windows for Desktop Users Put to the Test
  • From: Hadron Quark <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:53:04 +0200
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:tzJn/6ICo+bx/9pecU0z+F5Xw8E=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: CERN LHC - http://public.web.cern.ch/public/
  • References: <1160316033.495672.198330@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <pan.2006.10.08.15.00.49.294212@zianet.com>
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1165729
ray <ray@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 07:00:33 -0700, newsgroups wrote:
>
>> Is MS Windows ready for the desktop?
>> 
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | The last few years, there's been a lot of talk about this
>> | new Windows XP thing (to quote Bono at a 1984 concert:
>> | very, very too much talk!). What's all the buzz about,
>> | and how can you turn Windows XP to your advantage, if
>> | this is possible at all? Is MS Windows really that hard
>> | to install and manage, or is that story just the usual
>> | Red-Hat FUD? Your editor, though new to the whole
>> | Windows-movement, will try to figure this out for you today!
>> `----
>> 
>> http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/47221/
>
> Yes, more or less, as long as it's not on the internet.
>

Lets see, roughly 97 or so out of a 100 desktop users use XP/NT and you
guys are questioning whether it can be used to ones advantage? And the
person doing the "expose" is "new to Windows". Talk about a stitch up.

Please, someone, tell me this isn't so. Have I stumbled across some
weird cult or parallel Universe?


-- 
Texan:
	A wet-back that didn't make Oklahoma.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index