Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Windows Servers Bloodbath?

  • Subject: Re: Windows Servers Bloodbath?
  • From: "billwg" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 18 Oct 2006 11:06:07 -0700
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
  • In-reply-to: <1161183925.265681.222390@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
  • Injection-info: k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=143.127.131.4; posting-account=a_jYsQ0AAABnV36oqL78TT3DuUCRpOn3
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <1161183925.265681.222390@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
  • User-agent: G2/1.0
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1171595
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Windows servers at risk at Linux-friendly Bartter
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Local poultry producer Bartter Enterprises is evaluating
> | the future of around 70 Microsoft Windows servers, in the
> | context of a recent migration of other systems to Red Hat Linux.
> |

Well they replaced whatever unix stuff they had with linux in order to
avoid paying for big iron, royboy, which is pretty much par for the
linux course.  But even a turkey farmer is going to think pretty hard
about abandoning Exchange and other office automation services.  I bet
the guy will decide to keep his job and stay with Windows servers for
these functions.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index