On 2006-10-17, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:21:20 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> Author dishes on SELinux enhancements to RHEL5
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| Now Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and SELinux will have policy
>>| modules, which are small loadable pieces that can be
>>| distributed with an application or created by an
>>| administrator. Then, the admin creates the module
>>| and installs it on a system. This approach allows
>>| Red Hat to ship default policies for several apps
>>| that can be automated and applied right out of the box.
>> `----
>>
>> http://searchopensource.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1224659,00.html
>> http://tinyurl.com/ynza57
>
> Oh, but Linux is already secure, isn't it?
Sez whom, Erik? I recall people saying _more_ secure than something
else. I know this isn't possible, security being binary and all. But
that's what I recall seeing and hearing.
--
Toyep: Innovative Microsoft peer-to-peer software.
|
|
