Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: More [News] Roy seems to have missed...

  • Subject: Re: More [News] Roy seems to have missed...
  • From: Peter KÃhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:38:58 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: SMP
  • References: <1js292548rog1$.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <ei1m48$a62$01$1@news.t-online.com> <u151h.28$Zq6.16@newsfe12.lga>
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1175086
flatfish+++ wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:45:15 +0100, Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
> 
>> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>> 
>>> Highly Critical Security Vulnerability in Firefox 2.0
>>> 
>>> Seems Firefox 2.0 has a highly critical flaw that was originally patched
>>> in 1.5.0.5, but somehow never made it into the 2.0 tree.
>>> 
>>> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/28/2115202
>>> 
>>> Note also the reports of increased instability and memory leaks, not to
>>> mention poor compatibility.
>>> 
>>> Let's see, what would Peter K say?  Oh yeah:
>>> 
>>> "Shitty as always"
>> 
>> Nope. That applies only when the old versions were shitty also.
>> Like windows. Or IE. Or OE
> 
> 
> Notice the sidestep.........

What sidestep, flatbrain?
If the previous version was not shitty, how could the new one be "shitty as
always"?
This applies to windows software though. All versions were shitty beyond
belief. And the new ones follow suit
-- 
Windows was created to keep stupid people away from UNIX."
  -- Tom Christiansen


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index