On 2006-10-27, Roy Culley <rgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
> begin risky.vbs
> <11fvpgrmu89b4$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:13:52 +0200, Roy Culley wrote:
>>
>>> Since your gambling return you haven't continued your inane followups
>>> to Roy S' posts. Has your master plan backfired. Is their something
>>> cunning in your not making these inane followups anymore?
>>>
>>> Come on Erik, you said there was a plan. What was it? Or were you just
>>> being a plonker as usual?
>>
>> I've been too busy catching up to respond to most of Roy's tripe,
>> don't worry, i've not forgotten.
>
> It isn't your inane replies to Roy's posts I'm asking about Erik. Any
> idiot can do that. It is the plan behind it. So far it has just made
> you look an idiot. What is this cunning plan Erik?
My guess is it's something to do with making the list longer for the
things he runs from.
--
I'm using linux daily to up my productivity. So, up yours,
Microsoft.
|
|
