Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:36:29 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/linux/2006/1016linux1.html
> Funny how when these studies support Linux, they're lauded, but
> they're bullshit when they support Windows.
>
> Hypocrites.
Pitiful they are. The wackjob 'ralph' who used to haunt cola with his
misspellings ("...MS has found ways to incress revinue dispite declining
groth of market share.") argued with me and dismissed an earlier
NetworkWorld comparison that gave the nod to WinServer 2003 over Linux,
Netware and OS/X.
http://www.networkworld.com/best/2004/0223os.html
|
|
