Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: ie7 sooner run on linux than win9x?

  • Subject: Re: ie7 sooner run on linux than win9x?
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:46:17 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / ISBE, Manchester University / ITS / Netscape / MCC
  • References: <Xns9835450C4916xn@216.196.97.142> <1157441347.093670.20750@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1157448866.312589.260220@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1157450701.725840.217830@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ casioculture@xxxxxxxxx ] on Tuesday 05 September 2006 11:05 \__

> sasquatch wrote:
>> Linux has it's own set of great browsers. Quit bugging about IE, if you
>> want it in Linux you're gonna have to use wine, it'll be slow, it'll
>> look ugly, and it still doesn't have tabbed browsing (a feature that I
>> cannot live without).
>>
>> Browsers to use on Linux:
>>
>> Firefox: The greatest and best open-source browser.
>> Opera: Not oss (open source) unfortunately, but it's a damn good
>> browser (though it doesn't like gmail).
> 
> I'd put Konqueror before Opera.

I'm sorry, but people /still/ must use IE. How else will they install
(potentially arbitrary) programs? *grin* And I'm not thinking about ActiveX.
Neither is browser compatibility testing a concern.

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Can Mac OS X and Vista catch up? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYjv0S_k0xo
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 111 total,   2 running, 109 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index