flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:00:08 +0100, Kier wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:39:33 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes. Common sense would suggest that. But Roytoy has decided that he
>>> wont do it because then he wouldnt see his name is lights so
>>> frequently. And Mark's digest thing is probably autobuilt from Roytoy's
>>> original repostings of links stolen from the major Linux sites who went
>>> to effort & cost to report initially : thus depriving them of their
>>> possible advertising royalties and so further hurting the entire OSS
>>> community. And yet the gang cant see that. Roy is doing so much to hurt
>>> the OSS community it scares me.
>>
>> Oh, what utter bullshit. You cannot 'steal' links. Stop being such a lying
>> dickhead.
>
>
> From the same guy who claimed Roy was NOT in violation of copyright
> infringement when he was using a copyrighted image on his web site without
> permission from the author.
>
>
Of course you can : these sites get income from advertising clicks. Roy,
by providing direct links, is doing just that.
--
Rule of Open-Source Programming #7:
Release early, release often. Clean compilation is optional.
|
|
