On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:17:47 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
> begin oe_protect.scr
> alt <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:59:24 +0200, Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hadron Quark wrote:
>>>
>>>> alt <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>> < snip >
>>>
>>>>> I agree that for conversation on items, separate posts are better.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Why? Simply reply to the DIGEST and alter the header accordingly.
>>>> People can then kill sub threads as appropriate. But then you knew
>>>> that.
>>
>> And you knew that you could simply filter out any subject with the tag
>> [NEWS] in it, yet you still whine and complain about it. You can even
>> filter out Roy's posts in their entirety! Assuming you are using a
>> modern news reader. You are using a modern news reader, aren't you?
>
> I think the problem here is more likely to be the driver than to be the
> car.
>
no comment ;-)
>
>>
>>>> A digest also has the advantage that a reader can browse down the
>>>> single article and pick things of interest as opposed to killing all
>>>> Roy's posts.
>>
>> Again, use a filter, moron. It's what I do so I don't have to suffer
>> your sphere of stupidity.
>>
>>
>>>> Remember : this is the ONLY ng that this happens in. All other sites,
>>>> info sources send a single post/digest.
>>
>> Good for them. This isn't a site nor an info source. It's a free-form
>> news group. Quit your whining. If you don't like it, unsubscribe. Wah.
>
> You can't create a digest /until/ you've got the posts. Doh.
Heh. Never thought of that angle.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>> Simple really.
>>>
>>> Remember: This is the only linux NG infested by widiots
>>
>> I have him in the killfile. I didn't even know he had replied to me. Not
>> that I even care what he has to say, except to ridicule and show the
>> public what an idiot he is.
>>
>>
>>
> He's got that off to a T.
It doesn't hurt to help push him off the cliff.
|
|
