Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: And another happy family, courtesy of Linux ...

  • Subject: Re: And another happy family, courtesy of Linux ...
  • From: Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:13:18 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <pan.2006.09.01.00.11.12.750129@linetec.nl> <4298542.TAsjvmD9dY@schestowitz.com> <87r6ywnilg.fsf@mail.com> <ed8p6u$lg$00$2@news.t-online.com>
  • User-agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux))
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1147874
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:01:13 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> Hadron Quark wrote:
> 
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> 
>>> I run KDE (SUSE 9.3) with just 256 MB or RAM. Most of the time, only
>>> three quarters of the RAM is being used. No disk space either (I always
>>> see the meters at the bottom).
>> 
>> Wow. Linux is using magical pixie dust memory now. Is there nothing it
>> cant do? I bet your 20048x1640 desktop only uses 16k in 24 bit depth too.
>> 
> 
> Your post is as stupid as one can expect from the likes of you
> KDE runs very well on 256MB systems

I used to run it on an old P3 with only a 600mhz chip and that much
memory, and it was fine. Not a sprinter, but not that slow either.

If there's a faster machine available to compare it with, then it is going
to seem *much* slower, IMO, but if it's the only machine around, it will
hardly be noticed.

-- 
Kier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index