In article <KH9Og.16627$726.12408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, DFS wrote:
> My supposition is the vast majority of Roy S. news posts have misleading
> or outright lies in the titles, and his "commentary" is similarly
> untruthful.
Are you only couting explicit untruth, or also implicit untruth. For
example, a post about a particular bug in a non-Linux system might be 100%
accurate, but when it is posted as an advocacy argument, there is also an
implicit claim that Linux does *NOT* suffer from a similar bug (else the
post would not be on topic for an advocacy group). If that implicit claim
is wrong, are you going to count it as an untruth?
--
--Tim Smith
|
|
