akar wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> Speaking of RH screensavers, I wouldn't trust them.
>>
>>
>
http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/07/22/pornographic-screensavers/
>>
>> FC3 was to blame.
> The fuss: It showed a picture of a building with a sign on it that says
> "porno supermarket" Not a girl or a dildo in sight...
> Sheesh, some people have small minds and lives....
I tend to agree... but for the sake of setting the record straight:
webcollage doesn't filter images at all, and it's easy to go make a cup of
tea and come back to a screen full of girls and dildos and all sorts of
other even less savoury things!
Cheers,
Ben
|
|
