Asstroturfer OK wrote on behalf of micoshaft corporation:
> On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:26:18 GMT, 7
> <website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Asstroturfer OK wrote on behalf of micoshaft corporation:
>>
>>> On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:44:16 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>April 2007 Web Server Survey
>>>>
>>>>,----[ Quote ]
>>>>| In the April 2007 survey we received responses from 113,658,468 sites,
>>>>| an increase of 3.2 million sites from last month's survey. Apache
>>>>| continues to be the most widely-used web server, powering more than
>>>>| 66.9 million sites, compared to 35.3 million sites using Microsoft
>>>>| server software.
>>>>`----
>>>>
>>>>http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2007/04/02
>>april_2007_web_server_survey.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Related:
>>>>
>>>>Open Source Fights Back
>>>>
>>>>,----[ Quote ]
>>>>| Question: The OpenSourceParking.com announcement cites a Netcraft
>>>>| report, which found that GoDaddy.com's migration from Linux to Windows
>>>>| caused Apache to lose server share. Was this event the sole impetus
>>>>| for OpenSourceParking.com?
>>>>|
>>>>| Perens: Not the first. It's part of a continuing behavior pattern by
>>>>| Microsoft that I think it's fair to call "dirty fighting." GoDaddy was
>>>>| using Apache (I assume on Linux) because it was a great technical
>>>>| solution. They didn't switch to IIS on Windows Server 2003 for any
>>>>| technical reason. The switch was accompanied by a press release by
>>>>| GoDaddy, containing Microsoft promotional language. Now, I've changed
>>>>| many servers from one thing to another, but I've never made a press
>>>>| release about it. GoDaddy wouldn't be doing that unless Microsoft had
>>>>| offered them something valuable in return. There has been talk in the
>>>>| domain business that Microsoft has been offering the large domain
>>>>| registries a wad of cash to switch their parked sites. There is no
>>>>| other reason to do this than to influence the Netcraft figures.
>>>>`----
>>>>
>>>>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/item/?ci=15108
>>>
>>> Yes, most parked sites are hosted on Apache, that's no secret.
>>>
>>> On the *active* sites front, IIS is gained over Apache in the last
>>> month:
>>>
>>> Apache -0.08%
>>> Microsoft 0.46%
>>>
>>> That's 751'102 new active IIS (and presumably .NET) server apps in
>>> March, while Apache regressed only a tiny bit: new stuff is built on
>>> the Microsoft platform.
>>
>>
>>In other words you are holding up statistical noise as gain.
>>Scraping bottom of the barrel comes to mind.
>
> .75 million is not noise.
0.46% is noise
>>Most businesses run Micoshaft products in quarantine mode.
>>Linux routers, Linux firewalls, Linux proxies and Linux servers
>>protect micoshaft products from the real internet.
>>It doesn't make business sense for IT departments to be running
>>micoshaft products that way despite having paid.
>>Surveys have shown most big new projects are Linux based.
>
> Not on the Netcraft stats.
Netcraft stats reveal Linux routers, Linux firewalls, Linux proxies
and Linux servers protecting quarantined micoshaft infrastructure?
Don't think so!
|
|
