__/ [ mike ] on Thursday 05 April 2007 03:13 \__
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:42:30 -0400, amicus_curious wrote:
>
>>
>> "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:4614346D.725DD58D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Doug Mentohl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
>>>> FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff, The SCO Group, Inc, respectfully submits this Memorandum in
>>>> Support of Its Motion to Deem a Prospective Third-Party Deposition in
>>>> Related Litigation to be a Deposition Taken in This Case as Well.
>>>>
>>>> BACKGROUND
>>>>
>>>> In the SCO v. Novell litigation, by agreement of the parties, SCO has
>>>> until May 31, 2007, in which to serve a subpoena on and take the
>>>> deposition of a non-party witness Pamela Jones. The prospective
>>>> deposition of Ms. Jones bears on this litigation as well. Accordingly,
>>>> SCO asks the Court to deem Ms. Jones deposition to be taken in this
>>>> case, providing notice of the deposition it IBM and an opportunity to
>>>> participate if the company so chooses.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-1018.pdf
>>>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070403233141649
>>>
>>> Any evidence that Groklaw/Jones published or had access to any insider
>>> information?
>>>
>>> If not, what is SCO's claim? That shining the light of public scrutiny
>>> on their schemes isn't fair?
>>>
>> You seem to turn a blind eye to the claim that Groklaw was funded and
>> supported in an ongoing fashion by IBM and Novell. That is SCO's claim
>> and one that they have applied to a Federal judge to collect evidence in
>> regard
>> to. Now if you think that SCO is just pussyfooting around looking for
>> some dirt to dig up, you might consider the downside of boogie jiving a
>> Federal
>> judge. Presumably, even if SCO is willing to skirt the legalities,
>> Boise's
>> law firm would not be so inclined. Jones is a paid Linux shill, pure and
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[rant warning /]
Listen to yourself, Bill Weisgerber. You make me bloody sick! It is you, Bill
Weisgerber, who was exposed as one that gets paid to shill for Microsoft
(the paid2post thing in the New York Times). I, like PJ, have nothing but
personal belief to drive my actions. While your fascist approach to
supporting a suppressive and corrupt business world is fuelled by financial
interests, some people out there are actually concerned about the morbid
state of the industy, which is corrupted the most by perdatory business
minds like yours (you're a professor in economics, aren't you? I know the
type). So which is your course's textbook? A Mousolini thesis?
>> simple, and SCO seems to have the goods on the rascals who are supporting
>> her. She sure is hiding out for someone who is innocent.
>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> "There's something vewy scwewy going on awound here." -- Elmer Fudd
>
> it's called grasping at straws
--
~~ Best wishes
Steve Ballmer is even monkier than his moniker suggests
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 130 total, 1 running, 124 sleeping, 0 stopped, 5 zombie
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
|
|
