Windows multi-boot process just gets worse
,----[ Quote ]
| I tried to install Vista Ultimate 64-bit edition on my quad-core
| Xeon system, which already had WinXP 32 and WinXP 64, each in its
| own partitition. The first try was to install it in the same
| partition as one of existing Windows. Unlike the older versions,
| which are more friendly to the notion of co-existing, Vista insists
| to disable the old Windows and move all its contents to WINDOWS.OLD
| folder, essentially robbing you of your old (and often, dearly paid)
| licence, apps, user settings and so on.
`----
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38625
Related:
Vista scoots to new boot, but it's still kinda rooted
,----[ Quote ]
| While Microsoft would like the world to believe that anyone running Windows
| has no need of any other operating system, that attitude doesn't cut much
| mustard with many of its users.
|
| Why settle for one OS when your PC is easily capable of running two or
| more?
|
| [...]
|
| One of the more questionable tactics that Microsoft has implemented in
| Vista is to automatically overwrite any existing MBR during the
| installation process without asking if you mind or giving you an option
| to back up.
|
| Microsoft says that the Windows installation system can't intelligently
| interrogate an existing non-MS MBR, although such features are quite
| common in the install routine for other OSes.
|
| It also argues that an "official" Vista MBR is required for security
| features -- such as measured boot, which works with Trusted Platform
| Module (TPM)-enabled chips to check that the OS hasn't been hacked or
| altered each time it boots -- to work correctly.
`----
http://www.apcstart.com/site/akidman/2006/09/1656/vista-scoots-to-new-boot-but-its-still-kinda-rooted
|
|
