Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
> Windows Crash Art
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Windows memory leaks are good for something.
> `----
>
> http://ironic-pentameter.blogspot.com/2007/04/windows-crash-art.html
Aw, pwetty.
And people say Windows types aren't creative, eh?
> Related (from yesterday alone):
>
> Windows XP OS is really quite a crock
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | It's amazing that Microsoft built-in a disk defragger into Windows XP,
> | but it didn't get around to building an operating system defragger.
It's available as a third-party utility:
~]# mkfs.ext3 -L byebyebilly /dev/hda1
> Why Does Windows Get Slower Over Time?
I researched this comprehensively, using references from both Einstein
and Star Trek. I get pretty good results by mixing the formulae for
Special Relativity with the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition, thus:
Profit = (Time * ((FUD + Hyperbole) / (ABS(Speed))) ^2) - Refunds
(Refunds is the constant zero, as per Ferengi rules.)
Therefore, as Speed approaches zero, Profit tends towards infinity.
I did consider including the value of Anti-Trust fines, but they don't
seem to make Windows go faster, either way.
--
K.
http://slated.org
.----
| I found [Vista] to be a dangerously unstable operating system,
| which has caused me to lose data ... unfortunately this product
| is unfit for any user. - [H]ardOCP, <http://tinyurl.com/3bpfs2>
`----
Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.20-1.2307.fc5
06:35:07 up 14:46, 4 users, load average: 0.31, 0.50, 0.48
|
|
