On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 07:26:48 +0200, Hadron wrote:
> "DFS" <nospam@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> waterskidoo wrote:
>>> On 2007-08-18, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> ____/ waterskidoo on Saturday 18 August 2007 17:45 : \____
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Novell violated a licence (in spirit). Is that right in /anyone's/
>>>> point of view? Novell chose money over people. Is that human?
>>>
>>> I'll let a court of law determine if the license was violated because
>>> I am not qualified to do so.
>>> Novell is like just about any other corporation, they want
>>> to turn a profit. This type of behavior was predicted years
>>> ago but the Linux community said it would never happen
>>> Now it's happening.
>>> It's all about money, and it always will be.
>>> Is the Linux community planning on mobilizing a boycott
>>> machine every time some company, person, major developer
>>> etc doesn't follow what the hard core community deems
>>> the straight and narrow?
>>> It just seems loony to me and the solution is simple, just
>>> use Debian or Slackware.
>>
>> Slackware asks for $59.95 at their store, while they're asking $49.00 for
>> Debian at
>> http://shop.cheapbytes.com/cgi-bin/cart/0070011413.html?id=LR8WYBSC
>>
>> Looks like they both hope to make a profit. Inhuman, eh?
>>
>> Roy "Lying Spamming Idiot" Schestowitz is nothing but a contemptible twerp,
>> who will use Windows and closed source proprietary code as quickly as
>> someone can offer him the right amount of money. Am I lying? Of course
>> not: his website lists Windows 3x/95/98/2000/ME/NT/XP and Visual Basic and
>> MacOS among other closed-source, proprietary technologies he knows.
>>
>
> And his "boycott" site generates click revenue from Google Ads.
>
> It's all about Roy and why he plagiarizes so many links from legitimate
> news distribution web sites in order to reduce their hit count and to
> increase his.
You cannot 'plagiarise' a link.
--
Kier
|
|
