waterskidoo <water.skidoo@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 2007-08-12, Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> Correct. I have pointed this out many times. If the likes Roy and Mark
>> Kent spent more time advocating Linux and stopped screaming "Windows
>> sux" into the faces of bemused Windows users then they might just get a
>> message across. As it is, most people shrug and say "It works for me,
>> why on earth should I change?".
>
> I feel Roy does an excellent job of advocating Linux because his
> posts are kind of like a one stop shopping place for information.
> I don't really mind some of his creative headlines and I also
> appreciate Mark's digest.
> Saying *it works for me* is fine if it's really true. The chances
No it isn't. Not in help groups. You can say "It works for *after I did
x, y or z" then fine.
But "It works for me therefore you are retarded" us typical of the way
most of the so called Linux advocates work in COLA.
> are that it really does work for that person because of
> differences in hardware and/or Linux distributions.
> Categorically denying problems with Linux, or Windows however
> is not a good form of advocacy. I don't really see much of
> either here?
You are joking?
|
|
