After takin' a swig o' grog, Richard Rasker belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> Well, would you say that this OOXML voting process can even remotely be
> considered "fair" or "balanced"? All you see is Microsoft using any means
> at its disposal, including unethical and perhaps even illegal, to push an
> "open standard" which isn't open at all, doesn't deserve the
> qualification "standard", contains numerous shortcomings and even
> outright errors, and only serves to perpetuate its own desktop dominance.
> This is evil, plain and simple.
Microsoft is a cancer!
--
Or is it a black hole?
|
|
