Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: More "quality code" (as opposed to "linux slopware") from MS

____/ Linonut on Tuesday 18 December 2007 17:06 : \____

> * Peter Köhlmann fired off this tart reply:
> 
>> http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/100789
>>
>> DFS will tag this a "feature"
> 
> It is.  It encourages alternative browsers:
> 
>    Users should view pages that cause IE to crash using an alternative
>    browser such as Firefox, Opera or Safari until Microsoft provides an
>    official solution to the problem.
> 
> *LMAO*
> 
> The same recommendation could be made about operating systems, by the
> way.

I don't know if you remember this, but about, umm... 10 months ago Microsoft
describes Office 2007 crashes as a feature. I kid you not and I can find a
reference. Actually, let me try now...

Oh, got it in just 5 seconds!

Microsoft: Word 2007 crashes are a feature, not bug

,----[ Quote ]
| Crashes in Microsoft Word 2007 are designed to improve security,
| says Microsoft
`----

http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;377659799


Also see:

Working around IE7s prompt bug, er feature

,----[ Quote ]
| So while every other browser on the planet can handle javascript
| prompts -- and have done so, pretty much since javascript was
| first stuffed inside the browser -- Microsoft didn't have the
| resources to deal with it and so, effectively, disabled it.
| 
| [...]
| 
| This stops javascript from continuing until the prompt box is
| addressed, then and only then will the alert box appear. The
| modality of the prompt box prevents javascript from moving on
| until the user has performed some action on the box.
`----

http://www.hunlock.com/blogs/Working_around_IE7s_prompt_bug,_er_feature


The Contradictory State of OOXML

,----[ Quote ]
| Other contradictions would seem to be impossible to resolve given the
| nature of OOXML itself, the stated purpose of which is to describe a
| single vendor's product -- bugs and all.
`----

http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070117145745854


A most ingenious paradox: make 1900 a leap year?

,----[ Quote ]
| I don't believe there's been enough discussion of the weaknesses
| gradually being uncovered in Microsoft's 6,000-page dump of Office
| behavior, which they are trying to call a standard.
| 
| [...]
| 
| To help Office to become a standard, one adaptation governments
| could make would be to retroactively declare 1900 a leap year.
| This would require updates to history books and other documents
| (for instance, V-E day would change to May 7, and the World
| Trade Center attacks would have taken place on September 10)
| but I'd like to see a cost comparison with the alternative that
| businesses dread: migrating to open document formats.
`----

http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2007/01/a_most_ingenious_paradox_make.html

-- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    "Yes, I know, but does it run Linux?"
http://Schestowitz.com  |    RHAT Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
 22:05:01 up 8 days, 10:53,  4 users,  load average: 0.81, 1.09, 1.51
      http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index