Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] [Rival] SCO's Xmas Present: Nasdaq Delisting, Effective Today

"Rick" <none@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:13n7pp5jro1lbf6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:58:21 -0500, PEDRO LITTLE wrote:
>
>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:2162720.778lWYELLZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> SCO Receives Nasdaq Notice Letter
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | ...as a result of having filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the
>>> U.S.
>>> | Bankruptcy Code, the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel has
>>> determined to
>>> | delist the company's securities from the Nasdaq Stock Market and will
>>> suspend
>>> | trading of the securities effective at the open of business on
>>> Thursday, | December 27, 2007.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/071227/lath028.html?.v=101
>>
>>
>> I'm willing to bet that Rick the hypocrite won't ask you - "why do we
>> care what SCO stock costs?"
>
> Why do we care what SCO stock costs? At least SCO is/was supposed to be a
> Linux related company.
>

Wrong again hypocrite. SCO was a UNIX company. And Apple is a Unix (BSD) 
company too. And the difference between the two is.... Nothing. Other than 
you are a low-life hypocrite who looks the other way when your ass-wipe 
boyfriend Schestowitz makes posts about Apple/SCO/whoever but whines like 
the little hypocrite bitch that you are if anyone else does the exact same 
thing.



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index